Early View Article - Assessing Ill-Being and Economic Stress: Negative Inputs and Civil Society in Europe

Assessing Ill-Being and Economic Stress: Negative Inputs and Civil Society in Europe

Unemployment, job insecurity, and inflation are major economic factors that contribute to stress and anxiety among the population, often reflected in reported levels of ill-being. This study examined how these adverse economic conditions impact ill-being across European countries from 2005 to 2019. The aim was to identify nations that manage to minimize ill-being despite facing significant negative economic events. To do this, we applied a benchmarking method called data envelopment analysis (DEA). While DEA is commonly used to study well-being, it is not typically suited to analyze ill-being. For this reason, we are the first to apply a variant of this method, known as anti-efficiency or pessimistic DEA, in the context of well-being research. Our findings show that Nordic countries are particularly effective in mitigating the impact of economic challenges on ill-being. Furthermore, we observe that countries with efficient public administration systems tend to better manage ill-being.

Policy implications

 

  • Shift from a well-being paradigm to a proactive ill-being focus by developing early warning systems that monitor stressors before they escalate into ill-being.
  • Strengthen capacity building and efficiency in horizontal accountability within state institutions that oversee government by:

    • Promoting access to information,
    • Encouraging scrutiny of officials,
    • Ensuring accountability for misconduct—particularly within the legislature, judiciary, and oversight agencies (such as ombudsmen, prosecutors, and comptroller generals).

    This can be achieved by fostering collaboration with front-runner countries through initiatives like the European Technical Support Instrument (TSI 2026) – PACE (Public Administration Cooperation Exchange).

  • Enhance citizens' policy literacy regarding horizontal accountability to encourage more frequent and effective use of these institutions.
  • Ensure adequate consideration of input and feedback from civil society and other stakeholders after consultations to foster trust in European and national policymaking and amplify outcomes.
  • Use anti-efficiency DEA as a tool to identify countries where stressors indicate the need for special policy attention.

 

Photo by Mustafa Al-Falahi